Interactive Investor

Stockwatch: Bumper yield and re-rating potential

21st April 2015 09:32

by Edmond Jackson from interactive investor

Share on

Has Telecom Plus fallen too far? The chart for the FTSE Mid 250 shares shows a bear phase from an all-time high of 1,903p in late 2013 to 785p just recently, with a bounce to 815p. The high represented a daft 49 times earnings (see table) in a context where many stocks became lathered up by loose monetary policy, then adjusted back. So there has likely been some macro influence with the five-year chart suggesting the stock has now returned to trend-line - if a rather simplistic, technical view.

Assuming earnings per share in a low to mid-50p area (implied by latest guidance) for the latest financial year, the price/earnings (P/E) has moderated to mid-teens with the stock supported by a circa 5.5% prospective yield. This makes Telecom Plus interesting and, moreover, five directors have just spent over £1.1 million buying stock at 800.75p.

The accounting reasons for downgraded profit expectations appear mainly short-term, while longer-term there are political/regulatory factors, and utility supply is becoming more competitive as price comparison websites encourage switching. Inevitably, Telecom Plus had to de-rate from a rich growth rating and it will take time for the market to determine a fair one in the light of change. On yield criteria, at least, it does currently look attractive.

Stock is prone to over-shoot, either way

Telecom Plus - financial summary
Consensus estimate
Year ended 31 Mar2010201120122013201420152016
Turnover (£m)369419471602659
IFRS3 pre-tax proft (£m)18.227.530.734.636.6
Normalised pre-tax profit (£m)18.227.530.734.636.662.965.7
Normalised earnings/share (p)19.53033.638.239.763.967.1
Earnings growth rate (%)-18.453.911.813.83.961.25
Price/earnings multiple   (x)24.615.314.6
Cash flow per share (p)-10.3-0.0355.526.6-24.5
Captial expenditure per share (p)2.22.111.61.47.9
Dividend per share (p)20.5222430344047
Dividend growth (%) 36.77.39.12513.34.14.8
Yield (%)  3.54.14.8
Covered by earnings (x)11.41.41.31.21.61.4
Net tangible assets per share (p)59.66979.990.7-23.2
Source: Company REFS.

It's a feature of stockmarkets how the trend in fundamentals can get stretched by sentiment, over-shooting fair values. This multi-utility offering telephony, broadband, gas and electricity has been a good example: I drew attention in May 2012 at 700p because customers were growing at 11% a year and half of new ones were taking at least four services; the prospective P/E was then about 20 times and the yield over 4%.

The re-rating was swift and a year later I argued it was fundamentally over-priced at 1,250p but the stock carried on rising - as if in a micro-mania. This extended to brokers' analysts recommending the stock and for illustration in the table I include their forecasts before a profit warning on 16 April downgraded profit expectations to £52-53 million after deducting a circa £6 million charge for higher than anticipated leakage and theft in the gas system. (This is management guidance, brokers have yet to publish.) It implies a £5-6 million shortfall in underlying profit - i.e. 8-9% - "due to the cumulative effect of retail energy price reductions during the fourth quarter and lower energy usage, mainly due to un-seasonally warm weather."

Currently the market is groping for an equilibrium price that balances these uncertainties; a chief risk being whether all this de-motivates the independent distributors on whom Telecom Plus depends as its sales-force. Many have built up shareholdings over the years, and the founder/chairman has attempted to boost their confidence with a letter saying the update reflects "incredibly good overall performance, and proves what a strong, financially stable business we are building together."

He says the shares have dropped again "because profits are expected to grow at a slightly lower rate than the market has previously hoped... I think this is a massive over-reaction." He's entitled to his opinion, although mine is that a de-rating was long overdue. It's been vital to arrest the fall, however, as negative sentiment can impact fundamentals if the distributors lose faith.

Directors plunge into the stock at just over 800p

Five directors have bought a total £1.1 million worth of shares as the price rose from about 780p, which looks quite a propping up exercise but also belief in value. The trading update was not altogether bad, and customer numbers for the year ahead are up nearly 11% to 587,223.

However, it is possible the industry ground is shifting and a higher dividend yield is necessary (by way of payout and stock pricing) to compensate for growing risks. "The outlook for the new financial year is subject to more uncertainty than usual, with the overlay of political and regulatory dimensions on top of any possible impact from movements in the wholesale energy markets or fluctuations in consumer demand caused by un-seasonally warm (or cold) weather."

Last November's interims were exemplary: adjusted pre-tax profit up 55% on revenue up 9%, with EPS up 41% and the dividend up 19%. But the shock revelation of a write-off for gas theft/bad debts and leakage over 7 years to 2014, quite begs the question whether new auditors appointed last February might challenge any other issues of aggressive accounting. While the write-off is an exceptional issue it reflects rather poorly and follows soon after a change of auditors.

It could therefore be argued, the 5.5% prospective yield - based on an indicated 14% dividend rise for the latest financial year and a 15% rise to 46p for the current year to end-March 2016 - is indeed required to help the stock establish a floor. Mind this extent of payout will likely reduce earnings cover to near 1.0 and the table shows a volatile cash flow profile, so for this dividend to be sustainable there cannot be any more setbacks. An £11 million write-down of balance sheet debtors will, however, not affect the cash position hence dividends.

"Averaging-in" would be the better policy

The dilemma is a penalty for hesitation; newsflow only needing to avoid any more bad news for the stock to edge higher as enough investors are tempted by the yield and directors’ buying.

Telecom Plus still has a good reputation among the likes of Which? and Moneywise; its distributors have grown by 6,000 in the last quarter, from just over 45,000; and the medium-term objective is to increase customers to one million. If such a target is at all realistic then useful earnings growth will resume and risk weighs to the upside. The logical approach, if you accept the risks, is a steady averaging-in.

Prelims are due 23 June, likely the next re-appraisal point.

For more information see utilitywarehouse.co.uk.

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox