Interactive Investor

Stockwatch: A share to buy amid political chaos

28th April 2015 10:09

by Edmond Jackson from interactive investor

Share on

Does AIM-listed Sanderson deserve a better rating for growth? Software and IT groups are prone to be rated as cyclicals according to trends in technology replacement; but shifts in the landscape can offer longer-term growth opportunities. Adoption of mobile and e-commerce by retailers is one such example as these firms strive for financial progress in a tough consumer environment; and Sanderson is well-positioned.

This small but nimble company has developed "multi-channel retail" as a growth prospect additional to serving manufacturers, such that accounts for the year to end-September 2014 show 59% of group revenue and 57% of profit derived from multi-channel retail. A forward price/earnings (PE) multiple of 14, easing to 13, plus a dividend yield of about 3% is undemanding assuming the UK economy does not stall.

Stock has traded sideways for 15 months

The five-year chart has shown very good progress from a mid-20p range to 76p by early 2014. But as many stocks benefited from loose monetary policy then consolidated, Sanderson has traded sideways in a 60p to 75p range for the last 15 months.

Sanderson - financial summary
Consensus estimate

Year ended 30 Sep

2010201120122013201420152016
Turnover (£m)2714.113.413.816.4
IFRS3 pre-tax proft (£m)0.50.41.51.91.9
Normalised pre-tax profit (£m)0.50.41.722.23.13.4
Normalised earnings/share (p)0.71.33.54.33.54.75
Earnings growth rate (%)-43.798.516620.6-1934.77.4
Price/earnings multiple   (x)18.513.712.8
Cash flow per share (p)6.16.822.54.5
Captial expenditure per share (p)0.80.90.90.71.5
Dividend per share (p)0.50.711.41.71.92
Dividend growth (%)12.544.446.242.122.215.25.3
Yield (%)  2.633.1
Covered by earnings (x)1.62.343.32.22.52.5
Net tangible assets per share (p)-34.1-31.3-5.5-5.2-5
Source: Company REFS.

However, the rally originates from post the financial crisis: I drew attention at 10p in August 2009 when curiously the directors' wives were piling in. If only for the interests of matrimonial harmony, the risk/reward profile had to be favourable; and indeed the five-year table shows a healthy financial profile with majority earnings converted into cash, supporting both investment and a progressive dividend policy. Just over half of earnings are recurring which mitigates the risk of IT cycles; and the end-September 2014 balance sheet had £6.2 million cash providing scope for further acquisitions.

A 22 April, pre-close trading update for the six months to end-March has cited revenue and profit growing by just over 10%. That implies very good progress in multi-channel retail considering the manufacturing side is quite flat; although its order intake improved during the period and sales prospects for the second half-year are said to be good.

Like-for-like comparisons at the interims should be more helpful to discern progress, as there have been acquisitions such as Proteus on 5 December, a warehouse management solutions business with nearly £2 million revenue in its year to end-September (albeit a £3,000 pre-tax loss). This, therefore, will have enhanced revenue and possibly group sales order intake, cited up from £4.3 million to £4.9 million. However, the group's existing customers are said to be "particularly active."

Reflecting wider uncertainties I discussed in my last macro piece, "the general economic environment continues to show signs of improvement, though sales cycles continue to be protracted." This mild caution has kept the stock in check - if anything it has slipped a penny from 65p since the update - which is to the advantage of patient investors playing retail's shift to mobile/e-commerce marketing.

"Cloud" business acquisition: a key strategic step

The October 2013 acquisition of One iota for a maximum £5.4 million, helped by a £3.5 million placing at 55p a share, introduced a proprietary "cloud-based" technology platform - capability that tends to be critical for software solutions in online commerce. Retailers such as Littlewoods and SuperDry are involved and the company made £195,000 pre-tax profit on £660,000 revenue in its year to end-January 2013; despite modest financials however the company looked a good fit hence scope to leverage sales. Last November's prelims cited One iota achieving its largest-ever order in September 2014, valued at over £400,000. There had previously been a smaller e-commerce related buy in August 2013, of Catan Marketing, albeit for just £0.6 million maximum outlay - providing e-commerce solutions under the Priam name to over 30 retailers.

Longer-term takeover potential

At 64p a share this is a circa £35 million business, 21.6% owned by its chairman (who acquired substantial equity at market lows). While it is possible the stake eventually gets placed with institutions, his exacting best long-term value would involve a premium for control in a takeover - thereby acting as a motivator towards such an outcome. Sanderson is anyway a long-term bid target for another IT group looking to develop capability in multi-channel retail and e-commerce. Any software group lacking a weighting in this area is liable to be at strategic disadvantage.

Intrinsic value does therefore imply upside

Having made this strategic move as a nimble smaller firm, Sanderson deserves more goodwill in its rating - but the image of "small AIM stock" prevails, hence the ongoing consolidation in stock price. In due course however it will bump up against the likely reality of medium-term good results from multi-channel retail, making the stock attractive as a tuck-away, especially to mitigate inheritance tax where many AIM stocks involve a high risk of a fall in capital value.

Negative net tangible assets may deter some conservative investors: the end-September 2014 balance sheet had £28.5 million intangibles in context of £25.8 million net assets. This is to be expected of an intellectual property type business however, and where the group's principal assets are its 190 personnel. There is no debt to compromise operating profit: £160,000 finance expenses related mainly to interest on a £4.8 million pension fund deficit.

In the short term, the biggest risk is likely a hung parliament with strong SNP influence, stymieing business confidence to invest in software replacements. However, the trend to mobile/e-commerce looks plenty firm to recoup any setback, making Sanderson one of the shares to be eyeing if political chaos does ensue.

For more information see www.sanderson.com/

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox