Interactive Investor

A Brexit 'buy' for Share Sleuth

1st July 2016 16:28

Richard Beddard from interactive investor

It took me nine hours to come to terms with the fact the UK is leaving the European Union (EU).

Between 6am, when I Googled the result, and 3pm, when I finally started work I anxiously flitted from one social media app to another, from Twitter, where I could read what the whole World thought, to WhatsApp, where friends and family consoled and argued with each other.

In a bid to do some work, I decamped to the public library. Normally I find peace and solitude between the shelves in 920 Biography, but the change of scene failed to prompt a change in behaviour and by lunchtime I was so desperate to shake referendum shock syndrome, I went for a stroll around the city centre.

Cambridge, has many distractions: grand architecture, curious shops, a busy market, tranquil parks and decent buskers but, although it was a sunny day, there was a chilly breeze and the crowds looked sombre. I thought they too were probably in shock. Cambridge voted overwhelmingly (74%) to remain in the EU.

Outside Waterstone's (I thought the books might take my mind of the referendum), I bumped into my son, one of the few young people that voted. We started chatting about the result and the day was mostly lost.

I thought it was a defeat for democracy. I thought the EU extends our democracy, and the claims and promises made by the leave campaign were disingenuous (I didn't think much of the remain campaign either). If the politicians failed to live up to their promises or the economy tanked, both likely in my estimation, I thought the electorate would be even more disillusioned than before. And we'd be poorer.

I recount this story to show I was in a febrile state of mind last Friday. Distracted and jumping to conclusions, it was a bad day to make good investment decisions.

Thankfully, I didn't make any investment decisions. One thing I didn't worry about was whether my pension fund was falling in value and one thing I didn't do was trade.

Working out the consequences of Brexit on the companies I follow is beyond me. There are too many variables and they're changing all the time. It's tempting to believe we can see the threats and opportunities in the future and profit from them, but I set the bar I have to jump a little lower. I rely on entrepreneurs and businessmen to do that for me.

I expect the firms I own shares in to adjust as the future reveals itself. They have valuable property and the thousands of people who work for them will continue to work out how to profit from it. My job is to find these resilient firms, not predict every cataclysm and dodge it.

You might wonder why I don't do both, seek out resilient companies but bail out of them temporarily during times of uncertainty. The answer is I wouldn't invest at all. The future is always extremely uncertain even when we think it isn't.

The reason I'm shocked by Brexit is because, deep down, I didn't foresee it. Now it has happened, why would I think my foresight is better?

Next

Yesterday, I added shares in retailer Next to the Share Sleuth portfolio. Next has a triumphant past but a questionable future.

When I read the annual report and extracted ten years of data from it and previous annual reports, this is what impressed me (there's more detail in this article):

- Sustained high levels of profitability, perhaps due to its mainstream but not dowdy brand, pioneering catalogue, and buying and distribution capabilities:

graph 1

- Willingness to return cash it does not need for profitable investment to shareholders through judicious buy-backs and special dividends.

- Some restraint in executive remuneration and some weighting towards the long-term.

- A degree of openness about the challenges Next faces, principally competition.

Although Next earns most of its revenue in the UK, my doubts about the investment aren't related to Brexit. Other things being equal, it would survive recession and ultimately prosper.

On Tuesday, I dragged my teenage daughter and her friend to Next to see what the next generation of customers think of the store. The clothes are Mumsy, they say. They might buy them, one day. My son doubts he will ever become a customer. He can buy everyday clothes more cheaply in H&M, and pricey stylish clothes in Ted Baker. On average he'll spend the same, he says, and look less average (he's an economics student, that's the way they think).

People change though, as they get older and Next's modest but more stylish than average look is its appeal. I've walked around our local store three times in recent weeks and I like it. It's tidy and well stocked with items selling at their full price. The staff are attentive but not pushy. They must be wondering when I am going to buy something. Maybe when I'm a 34" waist again.

It's the Internet I fear. Next admits competitors have caught up with the delivery and warehousing capabilities of its hugely successful catalogue business, Next Directory, and while more people buy online today, Next has been slow to launch mobile websites and get to grips with Internet marketing.

It thinks attracting and converting more Internet visitors into customers is an opportunity to improve the business. I think it's essential, if Next is to secure the custom of the Asos and Superdry generations when they grow up and tone down. The good news is, Next knows it must invest in its websites and marketing, and its adapting. The market, on the other hand, is pricing Next as though stalled growth, or perhaps a modest contraction, expected in the current financial year will persist indefinitely.

A share price of £48.40p values the enterprise at just under £10 billion, 11 times 2016 adjusted profit. The earnings yield is 9%.

I added 45 shares. After adding a £10 charge in lieu of broker fees and £10.89 in lieu of stamp duty, the transaction cost £2,199, approximately one thirtieth of the value of the portfolio.

Share Sleuth portfolio

Today, £30,000 invested on 9 September 2009 is worth:

£65,575

 

 

 

 

 

 

Portfolio

 

 

Cost (£)

Value (£)

Return (%)

Cash

 

698

 

Shares

 

64,877

 

Since 9 September 2009

30,000

65,575

119%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Companies

Shares

Cost (£)

Value (£)

Return (%)

AIR

Air Partner

624

2,165

2,297

6%

ALU

Alumasc

938

999

1,149

15%

ANCR

Animalcare

1,283

1,799

3,054

70%

BJU

Brainjuicer

463

1,793

1,583

-12%

CAM

Camellia

15

1,397

1,151

-18%

CGS

Castings

1,109

3,110

4,810

55%

CHRT

Cohort

804

1,016

2,372

133%

CFX

Colefax

434

1,020

1,975

94%

DTG

Dart

456

255

2,383

834%

DWHT

Dewhurst

735

2,244

4,300

92%

EDP

Electronic Data Processing

2,397

1,817

1,702

-6%

FIF

Finsbury Food

2,032

1,068

2,209

107%

GAW

Games Workshop

348

998

1,546

55%

GDWN

Goodwin

112

4,155

3,219

-23%

ITE

ITE

872

1,847

1,247

-32%

MSI

MS International

1,836

3,966

2,846

-28%

NXT

Next

45

2,199

2,183

-1%

RCDO

Ricardo

193

505

1,476

193%

RR.

Rolls Royce

351

3,511

2,457

-30%

RSW

Renishaw

123

2,325

2,619

13%

SAG

Sagentia

2,660

2,908

2,926

1%

SPRP

Sprue Aegis

687

655

1,237

89%

TET

Treatt

1,222

1,734

2,010

16%

TFW

Thorpe (F W)

2,000

1,950

4,588

135%

TRI

Trifast

1,556

570

2,128

273%

TSTL

Tristel

1,690

610

1,791

193%

VCT

Victrex

150

2,253

2,222

-1%

VP.

Vp

221

513

1,398

173%

Contact Richard Beddard by email: richard@beddard.net or on Twitter: @RichardBeddard

This article is for information and discussion purposes only and does not form a recommendation to invest or otherwise. The value of an investment may fall. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Related Categories