What happens to share prices when companies leave AIM?
13th April 2017 09:26
Both
and left the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) because large acquisitions meant they had to promise the backers of the deals that they would subsequently move to the Main Market.GVC and Paysafe are still two of the most attractive companies on this list with the potential for growth and strong cash generation.
Another company that continues to do well is window and door components manufacturer
. This is an international business that is not dependent on the UK and it still has benefits to come from the integration of acquisitions and cost saving measures.Moving
There appears little correlation between moving to the Main Market and getting a better share price. When it comes down to it, the performance of the company is the only thing that has a real effect.
Retailer
would have slumped on the back of profit warnings whichever market it was on.It may even have been the higher profile some of these companies had when they were relatively large on AIM that helped them to gain investor interest, whereas they got lost amongst the larger Main Market companies.
The most persuasive reason for AIM companies to move to the Main Market is to undertake a larger fundraising than they can succeed with on the junior market. The access to a wider range of investors is useful if it is required.
Last month
announced its plans to move from AIM to the Main Market. More than 180 companies have already made the move and 19 have done so in the past four years.Although the original idea for AIM was to provide a way of enabling companies to grow and build up track records so that they could move to the Main Market, there has been a greater number of companies that have moved the other way.
In fact, some of those companies are ones that have returned to AIM following a previous move to the Main Market.
More than 30 have made their way back. Many of these were technology companies that switched at the turn of the century when they had hyped up valuations.
Their market capitalisations subsequently slumped and they became too small to be noticed on the Main Market.
In fact,Tyman not only came back to AIM in 2004, it has subsequently moved to the Main Market for a second time. Tyman and other companies have used AIM to rebuild their business and generate greater value.
Internet domain names company Netbenefit was valued at £119 million at the beginning of 2000 when it made the move to the Main Market, but the valuation had fallen to just £6.93 million when it returned to AIM at the end of October 2003 – less than one-third of the original flotation valuation of £25 million in June 1999.
Group NBT, as Netbenefit subsequently became known, was taken over in 2011 for 550p a share, which gave it a valuation of £153 million.
It is noticeable how small some of the companies were when they graduated from AIM in its first five years. Many were valued at less than £50 million, whereas none of the last 19 companies were worth less than £50 million and nine were capitalised at more than £500 million – as Sirius will be when it moves.
Not all the former AIM companies moved to a premium listing. Some obtained a standard listing, which is debatably no higher a standard than AIM and, in many ways, such as related parties rules, a lower standard.
There were also a couple of companies that went to the Specialist Fund Segment (formerly Specialist Fund Market), which is a segment of the Main Market.
One of these is activist investor
(Guernsey) B, which has just announced a 87p a share dividend – the shares are not ex-dividend yet – out of the money it will receive from the distribution.Company | Left AIM | Value then (£m) | Value now (£M) | Joined AIM | Initial value (£m) |
Sherborne Invs (Guernsey) B | 07/05/2013 | 212.2 | 482.8 | 29/11/2012 | 207 |
Tyman | 08/07/2013 | 382.3 | 579.9 | 04/04/2006 | 86.3 |
Gulf Keystone Petroleum | 25/03/2014 | 924.5 | 268 | 08/09/2004 | 121.8 |
Africa Opportunity Fund | 17/04/2014 | 60.9 | 26.5 | 24/07/2007 | 61 |
Urban & Civic | 22/05/2014 | 373 | 345.1 | 17/07/1995 | 5 |
Green Dragon Gas | 27/10/2014 | 754.3 | 162.3 | 17/08/2006 | 277.8 |
Altyn | 19/12/2014 | 69.7 | 35 | 10/06/2004 | 10 |
BCA Marketplace | 02/04/2015 | 1225 | 1441.4 | 10/11/2014 | 32.3 |
Nanoco Group | 01/05/2015 | 255.9 | 74.4 | 01/05/2009 | 81 |
Zegona Communications | 29/09/2015 | 309.8 | 280.6 | 19/03/2015 | 35.9 |
Bonmarche Holdings | 19/10/2015 | 151.3 | 37.3 | 20/11/2013 | 110.3 |
PureCircle | 28/10/2015 | 745.7 | 548.7 | 11/12/2007 | 172.1 |
Paysafe Group | 23/12/2015 | 1696.6 | 2256.8 | 14/04/2004 | 239.6 |
Market Tech Holdings Ltd | 27/01/2016 | 879.55 | 697.4 | 22/12/2014 | 843.75 |
GVC Holdings | 02/02/2016 | 1490.4 | 2134.08 | 21/12/2004 | 130.77 |
Vinacapital Vietnam Opportunity Fund Ltd | 30/03/2016 | 374.08 | 568.1 | 30/09/2003 | 5.72 |
Dalata Hotel Group | 30/06/2016 | 553.47 | 727.2 | 19/03/2014 | 281.16 |
NewRiver REIT | 18/08/2016 | 782.57 | 790 | 01/09/2009 | 25 |
Secure Trust Bank | 12/10/2016 | 429.33 | 390 | 02/11/2011 | 102 |
FTSE 250 candidates
One of the things about going to the standard list rather than the premium list is that the company is not able to be included in any FTSE index – even if it is large. GVC had to move to the standard list initially but it did move up to the premium list and get a place in the FTSE 250.
Car auctions business
is still on the standard list, so despite being worth more than £1.4 billion it does not get the benefit of being in an index.BCA and
both reversed into AIM shells, which is why they were so small when they joined AIM a few months before the switch.Sirius Minerals should be heading for the FTSE 250 index, where it would join a number of other former AIM companies, including student accommodation developer
, self-storage sites operator , and .Three out of the 19 recent movers – GVC,
and Paysafe – are already in the FTSE 250.One former AIM company that is in the FTSE 250 and appeared set to move towards the FTSE 100 index over the next few years was grocery wholesaler
.That will not be happening if
£3.7 billion cash and shares merger with Booker is successful – that was equivalent to 205p a share at the Tesco share price at the time of the deal.The regulators will analyse the competition aspects of the deal, but there appears to be a good chance that it will go through.
While shareholders are waiting, they will get their Booker dividends and the shares yield more than 4%, whereas Tesco has not been paying dividends. Booker had net cash of £160 million at the end of 2016.
The food wholesaler moved to the Main Market on 1 July 2009 when it was valued at £525 million at a share price of 33p.
However, the back story is complicated. Booker returned to the London stockmarket by reversing into a much smaller food wholesaler Blueheath Holdings.
Loss-making Blueheath had big plans to break into the sector on the back of its technology and service provision but it found it difficult to do that. Blueheath joined AIM on 20 July 2004 when it was valued at £49.7 million at 121p a share.
The reversal by Booker took place on 4 June 2007 and that valued the combined business at £450 million, but the share price had slumped since the original flotation.
Investors at the time of the reversal have done well since then, but the Blueheath investors have not done too badly either, although they needed a lot of patience.
Performance
There is a mixed performance from the 19 companies that made the move in the past four years.
is complicated because it is difficult to find a transfer price, and there were C shares issued at the time of the move to the Specialist Fund Segment, which are probably included in the market value stated in the London Stock Exchange new issue figures.
Taking the other 18 companies, they are evenly split between risers and fallers. There are some big winners, given the limited amount of time they have been on the Main Market, and big losers.
Many of the losers are resources companies. They are more risky because of where they tend to operate,
in Iraq, for example, and because the commodity prices have slumped. Gold miner Alynt has also been hit by lower commodity prices and production.is an example of a company which has developed a new technology, cadmium-free quantum dots, but the take up has not been as fast as hoped, even with Dow Chemical as a partner.
The peak for the Nanoco share price was in 2013 and a disappointing trading statement has sparked a further slump in the share price.
Anyone who invested in GVC originally, when it had a different domicile and name, would have made their initial investment back in dividends by now. The €0.30 per share dividends when translated into pounds would cover more than 50% of the initial valuation of the company in 2004.
There are a lot more shares in issue following large acquisitions, but it does show how far GVC has come. The recent rise in the share price reflects the rapid integration of bwin.party and the swift return to dividends.
Company | Move (p) | Now (p) | % change |
Sherborne Invs (Guernsey) B | 103.5 | 153.5 | 48.3 |
Tyman | 224 | 330 | 47.3 |
Gulf Keystone Petroleum | 1022.5 | 119.25 | -88.3 |
Africa Opportunity Fund | na | $0.63 | na |
Urban & Civic | 225 | 238 | 5.8 |
Green Dragon Gas | 540 | 104 | -80.7 |
Altyn | 2.83 | 1.44 | -49.1 |
BCA Marketplace | 150 | 184.75 | 23.2 |
Nanoco Group | 109 | 31.75 | -70.9 |
Zegona Communications | 160 | 144.5 | -9.7 |
Bonmarche Holdings | 298.5 | 75.5 | -74.7 |
PureCircle | 585 | 316 | -46 |
Paysafe Group | 349.75 | 466 | 33.2 |
Market Tech Holdings Ltd | 185.75 | 145.75 | -21.5 |
GVC Holdings | 422 | 720 | 70.6 |
Vinacapital Vietnam Opportunity Fund Ltd | 177 | 283 | 59.9 |
Dalata Hotel Group | 325 | 396.88 | 22.1 |
NewRiver REIT | 324 | 340.4 | 5.1 |
Secure Trust Bank | 2350 | 2113 | -10.1 |
These articles are provided for information purposes only. Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.
Disclosure
We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.
Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.
Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.
ii adheres to a strict code of conduct. Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.
In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.
Editor's Picks